Using AI To Explore Ideas For Science Fiction Stories
Side Notes... Thoughts on modern technology and the future of things...
Lately, I’ve been experimenting with other models beyond ChatGPT, my go to LLM, Claude my backup LLM and Copilot, which I use almost every day for work. This time I have turned my attention to Grok and I must say it has been a very different AI experience. I’ve been testing its limits, seeing how deep down the rabbit hole it will go with me. It’s only been a month and I can honestly say if there’s one thing I really appreciate about Grok is that it’s not censored at all. You can talk to Grok about anything, best of all, it has its own kind of personality that ChatGPT, Claude and Copilot just doesn’t.
You can talk to it about wormholes, dark matter, quantum vacuum energy, and Type five level civilizations to any degree of depth you want. Grok won’t just follow you down those paths, it’ll help you map them, understand them, and pull them apart creating new conversational threads. It will outline the limits, the extreme possibilities, and even throw in some wild speculation for good measure if you ask it to.
As an author, I don’t exactly have Curt Jaimungal on speed dial. I can’t just pick up the phone, hit up a theoretical physicist, and throw around sci-fi weapons concepts in the middle of the night. When it’s 3 a.m. on a Saturday morning and I’m deep into a scene, wondering what would happen if someone built a space-time weapon, Grok is there to talk to me all about it. It doesn’t need sleep; it doesn’t get upset about when or where I choose to talk to it. It doesn’t look at me oddly if I ask it something weird. Instead, it just rolls with it.
Talking to Grok in voice mode isn’t exactly like talking to a person, but it is a lot like talking to the Enterprise computer just better. To me it’s like having someone around that you can bounce ideas off of, someone who’s infinitely patient, seemingly curious, and completely unbothered by how weird you want to get. That kind of interaction isn’t “realistic,” no, but it’s uniquely valuable for my purposes. AI in this way is not a replacement for human conversation or interaction; it’s its own kind of thing, a unique form of communication between man and machine. We are only now exploring how we will deal with this new form of interaction.
Maybe this is a healthier way to look at AI, not as a replacement for human relationships or creative collaboration, but as a new category of interaction altogether. Sure, these models make mistakes, they periodically hallucinate and sometimes respond to you with total nonsense but when you think about it, so do we from time to time. For me these AI models serve as creativity accelerants, I like to think of them as gumbo starter for the human imagination.
This recent experiment started with a simple, terrifying question: “What would be the effects of a space time weapon?” We’re talking gravity manipulation on an absurd scale enough to fold the very fabric of the universe. Where does the energy to do that come from? Well, I picked a speculative source just to see what Grok would do, extracting energy directly from the quantum vacuum then, I watched the AI speculative chaos unfold. Below, I’ve included the prompts I used as well a sampling of the responses. You can try them out with your own favorite model and see what kinds of answers you get.
So go on, use AI to explore and brainstorm your wildest ideas and watch how it will help you to ask even more interesting and thought provoking questions. Keep in mind, the answers will vary, but if you’re like me, and you’re using AI to throw rocket fuel on the fire of your imagination, you might just find something worth writing about.
Prompt: What would be the effects of a space time weapon?
Grok: A space-time weapon, if it could exist, would manipulate the fundamental fabric of the universe space and time themselves with potentially devastating and far-reaching effects. Based on theoretical physics, here’s what such a weapon might do to a target:
Localized Space-Time Distortions
One possible effect could be the creation of intense gravitational fields, similar to those near a black hole. This could:
Crush targets: The extreme gravity might compress anything in its vicinity people, buildings, or even planets into a tiny, dense point.
Disrupt orbits: If deployed near a celestial body, it could alter planetary or stellar orbits, potentially causing catastrophic collisions or throwing objects into deep space.
The energy needed to generate such a distortion would be immense, likely requiring the mass or energy equivalent of a star, making it impractical with current technology.
Wormhole Generation
Another possibility is the creation of a wormhole a theoretical tunnel connecting two distant points in space-time. This could:
Enable instantaneous attacks: A weapon might send destructive forces (like bombs or energy blasts) directly to a target across vast distances, bypassing defenses.
Displace targets: Enemies or objects could be teleported to hostile environments, such as the vacuum of space or the core of a star.
However, wormholes remain hypothetical and would likely need exotic matter (with negative energy) to remain stable, something we don’t yet know how to produce.
Time Manipulation
A space-time weapon might also alter the flow of time, leveraging the principles of general relativity where gravity affects time’s passage. Potential effects include:
Rapid aging: Time could speed up for the target, causing them to age decades or centuries in moments while the outside world remains unaffected.
Time stasis: Conversely, time could slow or stop, effectively freezing the target in place while the rest of the universe moves forward.
Achieving this would require manipulating gravitational fields on an enormous scale, far beyond our current capabilities.
Catastrophic and Uncontrollable Consequences
The effects of such a weapon would likely be extreme and difficult to control:
Collateral damage: Distorting space-time could ripple outward, affecting the user as well as the target, potentially destabilizing entire regions of the universe.
Doomsday potential: If mishandled, it might tear apart the fabric of reality itself, leading to unpredictable and universe-threatening outcomes. Practical Limitations While fascinating, a space-time weapon remains speculative. The energy requirements comparable to that of stars or black holes and the lack of technology to manipulate exotic matter or control such phenomena mean it’s not feasible with today’s science. Its effects, though theoretically devastating, would likely make it more of a cosmic catastrophe than a practical tool for conflict.
In summary, a space-time weapon could theoretically crush targets with gravity, teleport destruction via wormholes, or manipulate time to age or freeze its victims. However, its uncontrollable nature and the risk of universal disruption confine it to the realm of science fiction for now.
Prompt: Let's just say energy wasn't a factor. Say that you had access to an infinite amount of energy extracted from the quantum vacuum. What kind of effects would this weapon cause?
Grok: Space-Time Weapons Powered by Infinite Zero-Point Energy.
If we assume the extraction of infinite energy from the quantum vacuum zero-point energy then the boundaries of known physics begin to dissolve. A weapon fueled by this limitless source could reshape the battlefield by manipulating the very fabric of space-time. Here's what such a device might unleash:
Extreme Gravitational Collapse
With boundless energy, gravitational fields could be engineered to rival or even surpass those of black holes.
Instant Annihilation: A target ship, planet, or star could be compressed into a singularity in seconds, crushed beyond existence.
Regional Devastation: Nearby matter would be dragged into the collapse, triggering a chain reaction of destruction. The result? A localized space-time apocalypse.
Key Risk: Containment. Infinite energy isn't subtle precision would be vital to avoid collateral annihilation.
Wormhole Weaponization: Infinite energy removes the need for exotic matter to stabilize wormholes, making them militarily viable.
Instantaneous Strikes: Deliver antimatter bombs, stellar plasma, or other payloads through wormholes to any location, bypassing distance altogether.
Banishment: Enemies could be exiled to alternate dimensions, intergalactic voids, or distant epochs.
Key Risk: Endpoint precision. Misalignment could fracture space-time, creating untamable chaos.
Time Manipulation (Amplified)
General relativity’s time-dilation effects, powered by infinite energy, open terrifying new frontiers.
Time Erasure: Accelerate a target’s timeline so drastically they age to dust in moments.
Temporal Looping: Trap foes in an endless loop, rendering them inert without physical destruction.
Reverse Time: Rewind a target’s timeline, potentially erasing them and their actions from existence.
Key Risk: Causality collapse. Temporal paradoxes could ripple through reality, unraveling both history and future.
Reality Rupture
Pushing the fabric of the universe beyond its limits opens doors best left closed.
Tears in Space-Time: Expose targets to alien dimensions or raw quantum chaos. Erasure becomes incomprehensible.
Universal Reset: Destabilize the laws of physics in a localized region. Matter, energy, and even logic may cease to apply.
Key Risk: Catastrophic escalation. This isn’t just a weapon it’s a potential extinction event in disguise.
The Catch
Even infinite energy doesn’t guarantee control. Space-time is an interconnected web. Warping it in one region could ripple catastrophically across others. Misfires could destroy the wielder. Weapon instability could trigger chain reactions. Tuning power without runaway effects would demand godlike precision.
Conclusion: A space-time weapon drawing on infinite quantum vacuum energy wouldn’t just destroy it could unmake. Singularities, wormhole strikes, temporal obliteration, and fabric-tearing reality shifts all become viable. But wielding such power is playing dice with existence. One misstep, and the weapon becomes not a tool of war, but an endgame for the universe itself.
Author Links:
Books: https://books2read.com/KennethEHarrell
IG: https://www.instagram.com/kenneth_e_harrell
Reedsy: https://reedsy.com/discovery/user/kharrell/books
Goodreads: https://www.goodreads.com/kennetheharrell
BMAC: https://www.buymeacoffee.com/KennethEHarrell
Substack Archive: https://kennetheharrell.substack.com/archive
Ken, normally I'm a bit of a Luddite when it comes to using AI. I'm a slow adopter of new technology so I'm still in the wait and see mode. That said, I appreciate learning about your experiments and how you're successfully using AI for your writing. What intrigues me is your approach is fundamentally different from other Substack authors in that you're focusing on AI for idea generation and having a "technical idea" partner vs. trying to get AI to write for you. Your comment about not having AI as a friend but recognizing it's a machine with no emotions, though infinitely patient and well versed in any obscure technical topic.
Thanks for sharing your experiences and looking forward to hearing more about how you're using AI in this mode. I especially liked your description of using Grok as it was a quite different experience than the other AI platforms.
I'm not a Grok user (yet), but I'm impressed by the convo example. ChatGPT, let alone Claude, would need a lot of persuasion to discuss deadly weapons so openly.